Push Candidates Directly to Hiring Managers 8 [6 V9 r) \' g' y/ j% g
My prediction is that workforce planning, better assessments, scalable hiring processes, and hiring managers handling most of their hiring personally will become standard operating procedure within five years.
" w; y. `$ ?; c! ^+ R
. X: C, I8 G4 qTrovix and Authoria are already designing their products to be used directly by hiring managers to find candidates with limited recruiter involvement. Authoria has also developed a unique way for hiring managers to forecast their hiring needs for future quarters. This can easily be rolled up to create a company-wide workforce plan.
5 j: g/ F$ c6 A3 ?' J
2 [0 H( o& ^, b" l0 v# a' ]In addition, eContinuum, a new player in the business, has come up with a unique way to assess sales people, pushing finalists directly to the hiring manager. Using an interactive series of multiple questions, candidates are asked how they would respond to expected scenarios. This is being combined with appropriate assessments and a creative means to induce candidates to stay involved.
/ k4 M2 h. n4 |9 m5 q/ J; g# }; U+ l: r
$ R- w5 L1 k% k, s: oMetrics : @. u: {6 r# {; o8 j- [- I0 Q1 n! R; H
My prediction is that process-control metrics will drive the recruiting process optimization process, minimizing the reliance on historical metrics.
0 T2 B& F8 x) {/ A5 d) ~; e
7 n" n6 `; y r4 j+ R7 h, xIf you don't know how your recruiting department is performing today, you won't ever be able to get better. Using metrics that are a month old is an acceptable way to observe trends. However, if you want to implement rapid change, you need to use forward-looking metrics to anticipate problems and process control metrics to see what's happening in real time. ! s4 T- k4 x" M ^& U3 B; N+ B
/ Y. p& A7 p% b& s1 ^3 N$ T- N, zHere is my short list of metrics I'd start tracking on a daily and/or weekly basis: 8 I& |+ g! Q& l9 G" k) U8 B; R
7 A5 E. C( [; G" B6 \" {/ p- U( iSendouts per hire per recruiter
0 i/ y: Z: v7 S2 fSendouts per week per recruiter 3 z, R1 h5 b2 Z: t! q1 L8 l& @
Candidate quality * U1 D+ X$ M; c2 k' d
The change in the size of the candidate pool by position ( n! u3 [8 k2 _, x+ c& ~
Changes in the workforce plan next quarter by position
" G8 V0 `; Q6 I8 \" j# }Performance by sourcing channel, including complete Web analytics ) y! O, c1 B0 C+ A
Number of great referrals per employee
2 N, U' N- k0 U$ h \% E' D9 l/ {Number of great referrals for each passive candidate called : v, n3 m# _! U
These metrics will give you a realistic snapshot of what's going on every day. If you wait for the historical reports to tell you what happened, you'll need to wait too long to see whether the changes you have implemented are working. Cognos Business Systems is developing a recruiting department reporting package that will work with any applicant-tracking system. It probably won't be ready for a year, but this could be one of the most important HR software products you'll ever purchase. ) E; G% t5 b8 }% P
' a4 h; l4 ?6 }
Job Boards k. H# |) h/ l
My prediction is that job boards and the concept of posting ads will become irrelevant.
]) o- z9 e3 w j1 u
: q2 U& s5 D0 K6 v. ^. f, H' vIf all of the above occurs, the obvious loser will be the job boards as they're now configured. But don't worry: they're spending their money to develop new ways to handle these latest trends. You can accelerate this shift by rewriting your advertising to meet the needs of the most discriminating candidates rather than people who get excited by reading a list of qualifications.
) O# r% d- ?& s, g
$ g3 Z$ V$ |3 _9 bTechnology is changing the recruiting landscape. Some of it is good, much of it is just hype. I'm not recommending any of the vendors noted above, just suggesting that they're all worthy of evaluation.
8 u+ J5 A, w; `! x% u
, w9 p/ {' V* L0 Z1 B2 l% l( jThe common theme: technology is getting better, major changes are underway, and many of the approaches being taken involve pushing candidates directly to the hiring managers. This is classic disintermediation (eliminating the middleman), but the underlying reason is line management's disappointment with their corporate recruiting department's inability to consistently deliver top candidates. - E* j/ n' S8 Q4 S0 {
; G+ B* L' ?- [4 h* }9 XFrom what I can tell, HR technology would be far better served if it had more HR people who knew how to use technology. |