Would you like to increase your call-back percentage from "hard to hire" target candidates to 100%? It's easier than you think as long as you shift who makes the initial contact with these highly desirable but hard-to-contact candidates.
4 I9 y; m6 [7 K% }2 c7 p- X+ x+ a0 a- W# ?- ^& a" e' Q
I'm a fact driven recruiter in a world full of "instinct," ego, and emotion-driven recruiters. Data tells you what works and what doesn't work. . C5 H- a: d6 g" {# G3 A0 P
& z- Z5 `, L* b' Y) P5 N
If you are a fact-based decision maker, here are two facts that might get your attention. One of the world's largest consumer electronics firms found that: ( W' u1 l( R+ [. x ^/ B; _
0 @4 R* X7 e# p# _The typical response rate to recruiting calls made by a recruiter into highly desirable candidates with seven to 10 years of experience in a professional field was a respectable 30%. & v: ^* g$ v1 o7 X9 Q7 B# Z9 O6 w6 }% ?9 s
The typical response rate to recruiting calls made by a manager of the same level or higher to the same cadre of highly desired candidates was an astounding 100%!
* k% L {% K& B2 b* G( y# d5 hOther organizations have noted this interesting phenomenon, especially those where demand for talent is approaching all-time highs.
2 H+ M9 G6 F/ |4 J
. `9 n) b" z. \+ a- eRecruiting is Sales: Manage Prospects' Expectations to Win. F1 Y$ t: T% G8 [$ k# v
Nearly every organization around the world is recruiting using a process based on administrative needs, not on the basic tenets of human behavior. Recruiting calls of all levels and types are relegated to recruiters, and in many cases junior recruiters who scan, sort, and screen candidates for more senior recruiters. 2 A ^) j0 S7 q8 {: g2 Y# z6 M
1 Z' Y4 n3 m6 J, ?& ?The processes are based around recruiting as an administrative function, one where work needs to be accomplished in the easiest, most cost-efficient manner possible, even if the approach is not the most effective. 1 p7 E5 G1 B4 n& I
2 L3 y0 [' u6 ?8 E" I
Because recruiting approaches evolve at roughly the same pace as a rock, candidates have had ages to establish barriers to an organization's attempt to recruit them. Today, candidates have unprecedented visibility into organizations, just as employers have unprecedented visibility into the workforce.
5 |& d$ e! F! i/ m( b( x5 t9 H$ Q. f6 T+ ^) v
Both parties are armed with data, the only difference being that candidates actually use theirs! Successful recruiting in a labor market that presents numerous options to skilled labor requires that organizations understand the needs and expectations of each unique target candidate.
" G! y2 s/ n) E& `% \" @& c$ f
Because recruiters hound high-demand individuals each month, there is a natural tendency to ignore them completely. The key to increasing the response rate to such calls is to re-architect the process around the factors that would cause these high-demand individuals to return a call from a stranger. It's simple sales psychology, but smart recruiters apply it to the recruiting process daily.
F: [$ n' v: ]' q' X' J/ k% U( o3 q$ P( f/ O' c( I: ?5 {
First, understand the customer, any likely barriers, and what mechanisms exist to come in under the radar. For example, research and practical experience tell us some approaches increase the likelihood that individuals will respond to calls or requests, including: / r( j" Q9 G* t o, ?, l F
; m& P3 m+ Z& S! E1 r4 A$ D) b1 p
An opportunity to network with a peer in a similar position at another organization.
8 I0 S9 `& ^; q' gAn opportunity to discuss industry-related issues with a highly respected leader in the same profession.
2 N$ I; _3 x1 y# M& K+ ?An opportunity to chat with a leader from an organization that has a well-known "employment brand" or reputation for great business practices or innovation (i.e., Google, Microsoft, Apple). ( ^; \* p$ n( r/ p. W
An opportunity to vent on a day or time where they are distracted, contemplative, or frustrated./ |. d: p& x9 a3 s, Z
For the Very Best, Learning Opportunities Are the New Professional Currency
8 o+ g: j6 C! ?
. i8 b! R5 `. pThe primary reason why the response rate is up to three times higher when a professional calls is simple. The conversation isn't going to be a useless one that only provides one-party value, but rather a professional discourse. # Q! b7 j9 p- z, I2 Q; I; d
|( w8 N/ r5 m% z0 qEven if the call is a recruiting call, and the candidate is not interested, he or she has an opportunity to learn about best practices, discuss emerging issues, and form beneficial networking relationships. On the other hand, a call from your typical corporate recruiter affords little information of value that is not dependent upon pursuing a new job.
& l, Y% J7 @+ U: c+ e) M) ^1 T, u7 f* F( y% X
An opportunity to learn makes all the difference. Because we are in an incredibly fast-moving world, rapid and continuous learning has become the "currency" of successful professionals. Many professionals place their "professional standing" ahead of their company loyalty. Many view it as a professional courtesy to respond to others at an equal or higher level.
- y: O2 T: { } T
2 ]: Y: c: \8 W. J# E) @Michael McNeal, who invented marketing-oriented recruiting, took advantage of this approach when he developed the "Friends" program at Cisco in the late 1990s. The program engaged employees to call targeted individuals in their professional area who applied for a job on the Cisco website.
* h: i( m$ O7 Y+ K/ _$ K4 J" n; [9 u, B& S$ R/ T
Although many professionals will respond to almost any call from another professional, you can also increase the likelihood of getting a response if the professional has a well-known name or reputation.
0 \! T+ J; w3 z7 U! r9 E) ]% H# g% J- A7 a2 }+ C9 E& c
This is another reason to make sure that your top employees are "branded" well and included in the professional journals of their field. 3 |% S7 _' e; N
/ @+ s8 V6 v- q2 ?0 |
When these professionals give talks at conferences and seminars, or provide quotes in industry and professional journals, you dramatically increase the chances of a higher call-return rate. |