5. Identify their best recruiter. If your competitors are competitive, their recruiters will be constantly probing and calling into your company to find out who the best are and who's vulnerable.
4 Q6 i+ u' k3 B% C+ p. R
5 i* G( C: S6 f; qRather than being naïve, attempt to find out which of their recruiters are getting through and what their arguments are. They should be part of any blocking strategy, but the secret is to offer small reward to any of your employees who will take notes whenever a competitors' recruiter talks to them. Ask them to get the name, phone number, and make a list of the arguments they make. Then use this information to block their top recruiters.
% P' B+ i0 \+ _1 K4 w( a9 g! M* G/ `) ^
6. Identify their sourcing, assessment, and selling approaches. If you and your talent competitors use the exact same sources, neither of you has a competitive advantage. The same is true of applicant-tracking systems, recruiter training, and everything else you do. If you want to gain a competitive advantage, you must use different sources than they do. Research (i.e., use Corzen) to identify which specific sources they use for each of their key job families. - ^* Y* K3 F% Y4 Z F- B! m* \0 S
3 R- A W+ j- F4 F% A
If you're not a big-name firm, it's critical that you don't go "head-to-head" with them using the same source. Instead, purposely try sources that they're not using and shift from sources the minute they adopt them. If you want a competitive advantage in assessment and candidate selling, ask new hires on the first day about noted strengths and weaknesses. Yes, it's hard work, but you can't meet someone on a race-course if you continually follow their exact path. This same philosophy is true in recruiting.
+ W1 L6 A% o6 W* g
`' T: k, {8 |; V- }7. Getting through to their best people. Identify any weaknesses in their strategy by constantly probing to see when the best call screeners are "off duty" and whether the voicemail system has weaknesses that allow you to contact recruiting targets directly.
) n* x+ M( L% c, z
5 R) p1 f4 W3 V' s. h& {* MIf you're a fierce competitor, you'll track the successes and failures of each of your recruiters and use that information to plot a strategy to get your message in front of their best people. No need to use subterfuge here, just find out what works and keep doing it until they block it., E: B! V w* q: R& i4 U( G
( N' e2 ]( E* {$ s- {" V: [
8. Track their promotion and hiring announcements. Nothing tells you more about a competitor than whom they promote and when they pass over someone for an external hire. 4 Z. |! s2 a6 P" T& K- H+ |
, } ]; F, g# O. n1 } u" U
As a result, it's crucial that you track each of their promotion and outside hire announcements because both of these events means that there are people who are likely unhappy because they didn't get promoted. Contact these individuals immediately and make a pitch to those who will improve your organization.
2 A3 t! L& w; K% j; ?% h$ Y4 P9 f
& |4 _4 W) \+ ] a0 R; H. d9. Do your research. It's much easier today to find out what competitors are doing because of the growth of the Internet. Assign someone in your organization to study competitors' press releases and to do periodic Google searches using the words recruiting +XYZfirm. Read recruiting roundtable, Corporate Leadership Council, Conference Board, and consulting firm studies that mention the competitors' recruiting approaches. In addition, find out what recruiting and HR magazines and newsletters they read to ensure that you share the same information base.
2 k" [. t+ J* h- F9 y2 u/ V# m6 G9 `' [" n
10. Test their systems. Find out the weaknesses in your competitors' hiring systems. Start with asking new hires who worked at your competitors' companies or interviewed there about the strengths or weaknesses of the processes.
2 u9 E5 s) A R8 f( N9 b$ a3 |) ~+ j5 A% F! }% i1 P# t
If you're feeling bold, test their system by having a friend or one of your employees apply and then assess their response time. If the candidate gets far enough, ask their time to interview, level of applicant satisfaction, and their approach to interviewing and selling candidates. |